COCOON Theory and Applications to EVP/ITC
Introduction
The Cosmological Consciousness Ontology (COCOON), proposed by Israel del Rio, is a framework that integrates consciousness into cosmology. It posits a dual-layered reality comprising a Material Plane (the familiar spacetime of physics) and an Information Plane (a nonlocal domain of information). Consciousness plays a pivotal role as a bridge between these two planes, potentially offering explanations for paranormal phenomena. In this report, we first summarize the COCOON theory with emphasis on its biplanar model and the quantum-linked role of consciousness. We then discuss how this framework can illuminate Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP) and Instrumental Transcommunication (ITC) – instances where anomalous voices or images appear via electronic devices. Finally, we propose a range of experimental designs for EVP/ITC devices, spanning audio, video, and multimodal approaches. These designs are categorized by practicality (current vs. future tech), cost, and the degree of human operator involvement, and they incorporate advanced signal processing for enhancing and validating potential otherworldly signals. A conclusion section summarizes key insights.
Overview of the COCOON Theory
Material Plane vs. Information Plane
COCOON’s foundational premise is that reality is biplanaracademia.edu. One layer is the Material Plane, corresponding to our usual spacetime universe. It is entropy-driven, meaning physical processes tend toward increasing disorder over timeacademia.edu. The other layer is the Information Plane (IP), a non-physical realm where information resides and evolves. The Information Plane operates outside of space and time and is governed by negentropy (increasing order/knowledge)academia.edufile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. In this model, the quantum wavefunctions that underlie physical reality are said to exist in or be influenced by the Information Plane, even while their effects materialize in the physical planeacademia.edu. Other than quantum phenomena, the Information Plane is not bound by the usual physical laws and constraints of spacetimeacademia.edu. This allows it to be genuinely nonlocal – distance and time in the Material Plane do not limit interactions in the Information Plane.
The two planes are intimately interconnected via quantum processes. COCOON suggests that at the tiniest scales (on the order of the Planck length or fundamental particles), the Material and Information planes exchange information through quantum entanglement and superpositionfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. In effect, the Information Plane serves as a cosmic information field – akin to an ever-growing memory bank – that accumulates data from the Material Plane. All information about past events that have been “observed” or decided in the Material Plane gets transferred and stored in the Information Plane, functioning like an Akashic record of the pastfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. This implies that while only the present moment is “real” in spacetime, all past information persists nonlocally in the IPfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. Such a repository could, in principle, be accessed or interacted with outside of linear time.
Consciousness as the Quantum Bridge
In COCOON, consciousness is the key link between the two planes. Rather than viewing consciousness as an emergent property of brain matter alone, COCOON defines consciousness as a non-material entity residing primarily in the Information Planefile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. Each individual consciousness (sometimes called a “Conscious Entity” in this framework) exists in the IP and accumulates experiences (potentially over multiple lifetimes, if one allows for reincarnation concepts)file-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. The physical brain is seen as a transducer or interface device: it hosts structures capable of quantum processes (notably, the microtubules in neurons as suggested by Hameroff and Penrose) which act as quantum gateways between the brain and the Information Planeacademia.edu. Through these microscopic quantum channels, the brain and consciousness exchange information.
The mechanism works roughly as follows: When a conscious observer perceives or measures something, that act of observation – mediated by quantum-sensitive structures (e.g. neuronal microtubules) – triggers the collapse of quantum wavefunctions in the Material Planeacademia.edu. Upon collapse, a particular outcome (eigenstate) becomes real in spacetime, increasing physical entropy (the usual irreversible “arrow of time” for that event)academia.edu. Simultaneously, the information from that event (the result of the observation) is extracted and transferred to the Information Plane via the quantum linkacademia.edu. In other words, whenever a conscious observation is made, information flows from the Material Plane to the Information Plane, while energy/entropy changes occur in the Material domainfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. This constant loop of observation and information transfer is what COCOON posits as driving the flow of time and the growth of knowledge. Consciousness thus acts as a tunnel or bridge between planesfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht: it observes physical reality, causes wavefunction collapse, and sends the gleaned information nonlocally into the IP.
Importantly, COCOON takes a middle-ground stance on the origin of consciousness. It argues against the idea that consciousness is everywhere (panpsychism) or that consciousness is wholly created by brains (materialism). Instead, it posits that consciousness arises when a biological organism establishes the right quantum connection to the Information Planefile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. In this view, the universe “grows” consciousness as it evolves – consciousness is a natural byproduct of the universe’s evolution rather than the creator of the universeacademia.edu. Early in cosmic history, there would have been no consciousness until matter organized into living systems capable of quantum informational coupling with the IP. Over time, higher-order consciousness emerged and could eventually form a network (COCOON speculates about the eventual synergy of many conscious entities into a cosmic consciousness as the Information Plane’s store of experiences grows)academia.edu.
Because individual consciousness resides in the IP, it isn’t strictly localized to the brain or limited by it. This has several implications that COCOON highlights. For one, it provides a perspective on qualia (the subjective feel of experiences): qualia are not generated by neural firing per se, but by how the non-physical consciousness experiences information through its quantum link with the brainfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. The brain delivers data to consciousness, but the feeling of seeing red or tasting sugar occurs in the Information Plane’s conscious entity. It also addresses free will: since consciousness can access the repository of past information in the IP and is not fully bound by material causality, it has real agency to make choices among quantum possibilitiesfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrhtfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht. The act of conscious choice then biases which outcome in the Material Plane occurs (via wavefunction collapse), meaning mind can influence matter in a subtle but fundamental wayfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht.
COCOON’s elegant bridging of mind and physics suggests that many phenomena traditionally labeled “paranormal” might be natural consequences of this biplanar interactionacademia.eduacademia.edu. If consciousness exists in a nonlocal information realm, things like telepathy or precognition could be explained as information sharing or lookup in the common Information Plane, rather than as violations of physics. Indeed, COCOON explicitly notes that reported paranormal phenomena (telepathy, remote viewing, etc.) can be “trivially explained” by interactions of conscious entities via the IPacademia.edu. For example, two minds might communicate or influence each other through shared entangled information in the IP (bypassing normal space-time limits), or a disembodied consciousness might impart influence on the physical world by coupling through any available quantum pathways. In COCOON, all consciousnesses are unique quantum information patterns (no two are identical due to the no-cloning theorem)academia.edu, but they can entangle through shared experiences (the theory introduces Correlated Consciousness Experiences (CCX) to describe how mutual experiences forge entanglement between individual consciousnesses)academia.edu. Strong entanglement (CCX) could allow targeted influence or communication between specific beings across distance or even across the life/death barrier, since a consciousness might retain entanglement with loved ones or familiar places after bodily death.
In summary, COCOON portrays a two-tier reality: the Material Plane of physics and an Information Plane of consciousness and data. Consciousness serves as a quantum observer and communicator between these tiers, funneling information from the physical world into a timeless informational domain and drawing upon that domain to exercise will and experience qualia. This framework not only aspires to be a more complete Theory of Everything by including mind, but also provides a basis for understanding phenomena beyond the scope of conventional materialist scienceacademia.edu.
EVP and ITC Through the Lens of COCOON
What are EVP and ITC?
Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP) are unexplained intelligible voices captured on audio recording devices with no apparent physical source. Typically, EVP are heard upon playback of recordings and were not heard live at the time of recording. The voices often appear as short words or phrases, sometimes answers to questions, seemingly interjected into background sound or static. Many researchers believe these voices may originate from disembodied consciousnesses (spirits of the deceased) or other non-physical entities attempting to communicate. Instrumental Transcommunication (ITC) is a broader term covering all forms of purported communications through electronic devices – not only audio voices, but also images on video or television, text or code appearing on computers, anomalous phone calls, and even measurements from sensors that appear meaningful. In essence, ITC includes EVP (which is specifically voices/audio) and extends to any instrument-mediated anomalous communication.
Traditional EVP techniques rely on the idea that an unseen intelligence can manipulate electronic noise or signals to imprint a voice. As one ITC researcher explains: “The primary technique for recording EVP has been with an audio recorder and the voice is thought to be formed of available audio energy (background noise).”wedontdie.com. In other words, random sound (like microphone static, white noise, or radio hiss) provides a canvas of raw acoustic energy which an entity might shape into speech. Likewise, in visual ITC, random light noise (such as TV static or video feedback patterns) can seemingly coalesce into discernible images (faces, figures, symbols) without any normal source. Both EVP and visual ITC involve an anomalous ordering of randomness into information – be it a voice or an image.
The Information Plane as a Source of Anomalous Signals
COCOON theory offers a coherent theoretical framework for how such ordering could occur. If we assume that a conscious entity in the Information Plane (IP) – for example, the mind of a deceased person or any non-incarnated intelligence – wishes to communicate, it does not have a physical body to directly generate sound or light. However, according to COCOON, it can still interact with the Material Plane via quantum entanglement links. Typically, a living person’s consciousness interfaces through their brain’s quantum processes, but a disembodied consciousness would need to find another available “portal” for influence. This is where electronic devices come in: electronic circuits, sensors, and random physical processes at small scales all have quantum aspects (thermal noise in a resistor, quantum fluctuations in semiconductor components, etc.). Noisy electronic systems can provide a weak, fluctuating signal that a conscious entity might subtly modulate by exerting influences at the quantum level. Essentially, the Information Plane could inject information into the Material Plane by nudging stochastic processes in a device in such a way that they produce a structured, meaningful output (like a voice or image).
In COCOON terms, what might be happening during an EVP/ITC event is a form of trans-planar information transfer. A consciousness in the IP, armed with intention and perhaps entangled with the investigator (or the device itself), imposes a pattern onto chaotic energy in the device. The concept of “intention bringing order to chaos” has been noted by ITC researchers: “In effect, people (as personalities in the etheric) influence the environment via intention. Personality brings intended order to chaotic environments.”atransc.org. Here “etheric” is analogous to the Information Plane, and the statement aligns well with COCOON – a personality (consciousness) can impart order on random physical noise through its will or intention. The result is that bits of noise coalesce to form a recognizable pattern (a voice saying a word, or a face in video static) carrying information that originates from that consciousness.
COCOON also suggests that because the IP is nonlocal, such an entity wouldn’t need to be physically present near the device in the usual sense. The connection is quantum/informational, not mediated by classical signals. This could explain why EVP often contains information or voices attributed to specific deceased individuals or distant beings – those consciousnesses could be accessing the experiment via the Information Plane entanglement networks, not by traveling through the air as sound waves. Additionally, since all past information is stored in the IP (the “Akashic” archive), it might even be possible in some cases that what comes through in ITC is drawn from that repository (for instance, EVP messages could at times be essentially retrieved records from the past, rather than a live communication – though the more common interpretation is that an intelligence is actively communicating).
From the perspective of physics, an EVP or anomalous image can be seen as a low-probability fluctuation that manifests meaningful structure. Normally, random noise remains random, and any seeming patterns are coincidences. But if an external mind biases the outcomes (even slightly at the quantum choice level), the probability distribution can be skewed to favor a meaningful pattern. For example, in a sound recorder’s static, trillions of random thermal noise fluctuations occur; an entity might influence the collapse of those microscopic quantum events such that, out of the hiss, certain frequencies align at just the right moments to form a brief syllable. These “miracle” fluctuations would be incredibly improbable by chance, but not impossible – and an external influence making consistent choices (guided by the desired message) could make the otherwise astronomically unlikely sequence actually occur. The Information Plane link effectively channels extra information into the physical system, reducing the entropy (disorder) locally in defiance of what would normally be expected. Indeed, COCOON holds that the Information Plane is a negentropic domain: it can inject ordering influence into the entropy-driven material worldacademia.edu.
Furthermore, COCOON’s idea that two consciousnesses can share information via entanglement (CCX) can be applied here: an experimenter’s own consciousness might be entangled with the communicating entity’s consciousness if they share intent or focus on each otheracademia.edu. This could facilitate the information transfer – essentially a mind-to-mind link that uses the device as the output. (This does not mean the phenomena are imagined; rather, the human participant’s mind might help mediate the contact, but the voice still imprints on the recorder objectively.) However, the experimental designs we propose below strive to be operator-independent as much as possible, focusing on devices that do not require the experimenter’s psychic ability or intention to function. The COCOON framework doesn’t require a living intermediary; a determined IP consciousness could act directly on a suitably sensitive device, given the right conditions.
In summary, within the COCOON paradigm, EVP and ITC occurrences are interpreted as real-time interactions between the Information Plane and Material Plane. A conscious entity in the Information Plane uses quantum entanglement pathways to modulate physical matter or energy – typically the subtle random noise within electronic equipment – thereby producing a perceivable, information-bearing signal (voice, image, etc.). This is an informational exchange: the consciousness is transferring a bit of information (a message, a representation of a face, etc.) into the physical realm by temporarily “hacking” the normal behavior of electrons, photons, or other carriers in the deviceacademia.edu. The device then outputs this as if it were just another signal, which we can record and interpret. The next section builds on this conceptual model to suggest concrete ways to test and harness such interactions.
Experimental Designs for EVP/ITC Devices and Setups
Designing experiments and devices under the COCOON framework means creating channels where a conscious entity from the Information Plane could influence physical systems in a controlled, observable way. Key considerations include the mode of communication (audio, video, or other sensor data), the use of noise or randomness as a substrate for messages, and methods to amplify and detect weak anomalous signals. We also consider practical constraints like cost and currently available technology versus more speculative future tech (e.g. involving quantum devices or AI). Importantly, while some researchers emphasize an operator’s mental intention to encourage phenomena, our focus is on operator-independent systems that can function and produce results without a human “psychic” actively driving them – though we will note where consciousness (of operator or experimenter) might still subtly come into play.
Each proposed experiment/device will include:
- Modality: audio, video, or multimodal (combination of sensors).
- Approach and Technology: how it works, including any noise-generation, signal processing, or novel component.
- Feasibility: whether it’s doable with today’s tech or is speculative, and relative cost (ranging from inexpensive setups to advanced equipment).
- Rationale (COCOON connection): how the design leverages the idea of an Information Plane influence (e.g. providing a quantum randomness channel for a consciousness to manipulate) and how we plan to enhance or capture the effect.
Below, we present a series of experimental designs in structured form, followed by further explanation of some key elements and innovations:
Audio-Based ITC Experiments
Audio methods are among the oldest and most common in EVP research. They rely on capturing sound, either through microphones, radio receivers, or other transducers, and looking for anomalous voices. COCOON-based audio designs emphasize providing random acoustic/electronic noise as a medium that an entity could organize into voice, and employing signal processing to isolate true voices from noise. Table 1 summarizes several audio experiment designs:
| Audio Experiment | Description & Method | Tech & Feasibility | Cost | COCOON Rationale |
| 1. White Noise EVP Recorder | A basic EVP setup using a recorder in a silent room with added white noise (from a noise generator or fan). Voices may form out of the broad-spectrum hiss. Signal processing (band-pass filtering in speech range and noise reduction) is used to enhance any faint voice-like patterns. | Current tech: Use any digital recorder or laptop with a speaker emitting controlled noise. Easy to do today. | Low: (≈$50–$200 for recorder and speaker). | Provides a raw energy canvas for an IP consciousness to imprint a voicewedontdie.com. The broadband noise offers many random degrees of freedom that could be subtly steered into forming words. |
| 2. Radio Sweep “Ghost Box” | A hacked radio or ghost box rapidly scanning AM/FM frequencies (about 0.5–1 channels per second). This produces choppy audio bursts of static and brief snippets of stations, largely unintelligible. Experiment involves asking questions and recording the output for voices formed in the chopped noise. | Current tech: Readily done with detuned radio or commercial spirit box device. Well-known in field. | Low–Med: ($30 for a hacked radio up to $100–$300 for commercial devices). | The sweeping generates noise rich in voice frequencies while slicing up actual broadcasts into unrecognizable bitsatransc.org. According to anecdotal reports (and ATransC findings), the short, random syllable bits seem to help entities assemble words. In COCOON terms, an entity could use the pre-existing human speech fragments and noise pulses as “raw material” to time-align a message. |
| 3. Stochastic Resonance Amplifier | An audio circuit that injects an optimal level of noise into a microphone or radio input to amplify any weak incoming EVP signals. By the principle of stochastic resonance, a sub-threshold voice signal (too quiet to hear) could become detectable with added noiseen.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.org. The output is filtered and amplified, then recorded. Various noise levels are tested. | Current tech: Requires electronic skills to build an op-amp circuit or use DSP software to mix noise. Feasible with today’s electronics; concept used in other fields. | Med: (Parts $100+, or use a PC with software). | Enhances quantum-scale nudges: If an entity is only able to make a tiny whisper of a signal, adding noise can amplify that whisper into an audible form by nonlinear resonanceen.wikipedia.org. COCOON-wise, we are boosting the channel between planes – making it easier for a weak influence from the IP to push the system over a threshold and be recorded. |
| 4. Ultrasound/Infrasound Modulation | A speculative audio device that emits either ultrasonic noise (high frequency beyond hearing) or infrasound (very low frequency) into a space and records any modulation. The idea is that an entity might find it easier to modulate frequencies outside normal hearing, which can then be down-converted to audible range. For example, heterodyning two ultrasonic carriers could produce an EVP in audible difference frequencies. | Current tech: Partially feasible (ultrasonic transducers exist; mixing signals can be done in software). Not commonly attempted in ghost research. | Med–High: (Specialty audio equipment $300–$1000). | This provides a novel channel for influence – if IP entities can interact with pressure waves or electromagnetic fields at any frequency, we might detect voices hidden in ultrasounds that humans wouldn’t notice live. COCOON would view this as opening additional quantum interaction modes. It’s operator-independent and could reveal voices by translating them into our range. |
| 5. Quantum Random Speech Synthesizer (Future) | A futuristic approach: use a quantum random number generator (QRNG) to drive a speech synthesizer or a phoneme generator. In practice, software would continuously generate random sequences of vowels/consonants or pick words from a dictionary based on quantum random input. If an intelligent influence biases the random choices, coherent messages might emerge statistically more often than chance. Advanced AI analysis would look for meaningful phrases above chance frequency. | Emerging tech: QRNGs are available now; real-time speech synthesis is common. The combination for ITC is experimental. | High: (QRNG device $1000+, plus computing resources). | This leverages the direct quantum randomness as the point of contact. In COCOON, the Information Plane could manipulate the quantum bitstream (since wavefunction outcomes reside in the IP)academia.edu. By choosing certain bits, an entity could influence which words are spoken by the device. Because it’s autonomous, any clear message from pure randomness would be strong evidence of IP influence. |
Table 1: Proposed Audio-Based EVP/ITC Experiments and Devices. Each design uses noise or random signals in some form to provide a channel for a possible consciousness-driven influence, aligning with COCOON’s notion that quantum uncertainty can carry information from the Information Plane. Techniques range from simple (white noise EVP recording) to speculative (quantum-driven speech). All aim to minimize reliance on a human operator’s subjective influence.
Video-Based ITC Experiments
Visual ITC can be approached similarly by providing a random light/image medium and looking for structured images (often faces or figures) that appear without physical cause. Many classic ITC experiments use video feedback or random patterns (water, smoke, etc.) captured on camera. Here we outline video experiment setups, again from low-tech to high-tech:
| Video Experiment | Description & Method | Tech & Feasibility | Cost | COCOON Rationale |
| 1. Video Feedback Loop | The camera-to-monitor feedback method: a video camera is pointed at its own live feed on a screen, creating a loop of recursive images (similar to pointing a camcorder at a TV with no input). This produces swirling visual noise (a mix of scan lines, shadows, and static-like patterns). Short video clips (10–30 seconds) are recorded, then paused frame-by-frame to search for any faces or distinct images that emerge in the noiseatransc.orgatransc.org. | Current tech: Very accessible. Can use an analog camcorder with a CRT TV (preferred by some experimenters for richer analog noise) or even a digital camera with some tweaking of focus/angle. | Low: (If using old camera/TV, under $100; modern digital setup $200–$500). | The video feedback provides a self-generated chaotic system. According to reports, “patches of brightness in the looped video are often shaped like people”atransc.org. The hypothesized mechanism is stochastic amplification: tiny random irregularities in the video signal get amplified into larger shapesatransc.org. COCOON would say an IP consciousness can nudge those tiny fluctuations (photons/electrons in the camera) so that the amplified result is a recognizable face. The loop’s non-linearity makes it sensitive to small inputs, akin to how a little push can dramatically change the pattern – an ideal canvas for inter-plane influence. |
| 2. Water or Smoke Reflections | A low-tech alternative for visual ITC: disturb a medium like water (in a bowl) or smoke in the air and take rapid photographs or video of it under light. Many ITC practitioners claim to obtain faces in water reflections or smoke patterns. In our experimental design, we would use a consistent setup (e.g., a water tank with an agitator or speaker underneath to generate waves) and a high-speed camera to capture many frames. Later, use image analysis software to detect face-like forms in the patterns (to avoid human bias). | Current tech: Yes, straightforward. A DSLR or high-speed camera, a container of liquid and a mechanism to disturb the water (droplets, ultrasonic vibrator, etc.). | Low–Med: (Camera $300+, misc. apparatus $100). | This again creates a random dynamic pattern. In COCOON terms, any conscious entity could attempt to impose a momentary order (e.g., a face) onto the fluid dynamics. If consciousness in the IP holds an image (say, of its human appearance), it might influence the micro-level movements of the water molecules at just the right instants to briefly trace that image in the reflection. Because water and smoke are continuous media with many degrees of freedom, they provide a flexible “display” for manipulation. The use of a physical chaotic medium also bridges to the idea of mind-matter interaction on a macroscopic scale, albeit initiated at the quantum/molecular scale. |
| 3. Digital Random Image Synthesis | A computer-based approach: use software to generate random or pseudorandom visual patterns – for example, starting with noise arrays (like TV static) or fractal patterns with random seeds. Display these on a screen (or just keep in memory) and optionally allow a user to ask a question or prompt. The software would continuously update the random image. Meanwhile, employ a real-time pattern recognition algorithm (e.g., face detection AI) to alert if a coherent image appears. One could also use an algorithm to “average” many random frames to see if a hidden stable image manifests. | Current tech: Partly feasible. Random image generation and face detection are standard. Real-time correlation of an image to a specific target (like a requested person’s face) would need custom coding. | Med: (A good PC $1000 and programming effort). | This leverages the digital realm, treating the computer as the quantum canvas. Even though computers are deterministic, the use of a true random seed (from a hardware RNG or QRNG) means the process includes fundamental randomness. An IP entity could influence those random bits to subtly bias the imagery. For instance, if asked to show a known face, the random fractal might coincidentally align to resemble that face more often than chance. If statistically significant, that suggests information was drawn from the IP (where, presumably, the image of that face is stored in the consciousness or Akashic records). This experiment is appealing because it can be automated and can use rigorous statistical analysis (e.g., comparing how often a meaningful image appears vs. pure chance expectation). It’s a direct test of informational influence on a digital random process. |
| 4. High-End “Quantum Camera” Setup (Future) | A speculative future device that uses quantum optical effects to detect anomalous images. For example, a CCD or CMOS sensor operated in a very low-light, high-gain regime where readout noise and dark noise are significant (each pixel’s electron count is subject to quantum fluctuation). The camera could be left in a dark room or with a uniform field, so any “image” that appears is due to noise. Using image intensifiers or even entangled photon sources could push sensitivity further. The idea is to give an entity an ultra-sensitive blank slate – even one or two photons difference due to influence could create a visible pattern. The output is then amplified and recorded. | Emerging tech: Requires scientific-grade sensors or perhaps something like an EMCCD (electron-multiplying CCD) used in astronomy for near-dark imaging. Entangled photon imagers are mostly experimental. | High: ($5k+ for sensor systems). | By exploiting the quantum noise floor of imaging, this approach sits at the boundary between detection and emptiness – a place where, if consciousness from the IP can affect matter at all, even a tiny bit, it would show up. COCOON posits wavefunction behavior is rooted in the Information Planeacademia.edu, so a device that is literally measuring the random collapse of photons or electronic states is directly listening to the whisper of the IP. If a coherent image or even just a non-random pattern emerges on a sensor that should only show noise, it could indicate an entity arranging those quantum events to communicate. (This is analogous to the audio QRNG idea, but in the visual domain.) It’s largely speculative and technical, but potentially very powerful evidence if anomalies are observed. |
Table 2: Proposed Video-Based ITC Experiments and Devices. Visual methods similarly use chaotic or random inputs (feedback loops, moving fluids, algorithmic noise, or quantum noise in sensors) as a canvas for possible IP influences. The designs progress from known techniques (video feedback, reflective surfaces) to digital and quantum-assisted methods, with increasing sophistication in detection of meaningful images (including automated pattern recognition).
Diagram of a video-loop ITC setup: A video camera is connected to a television with its output fed back as input, with no external signal. Adjusting focus and angle produces a swirling noise pattern on the screen. Such a self-reinforcing video feedback system acts as a nonlinear visual noise generator, in which experimenters have reported seeing faces or scenes manifest for brief moments. The COCOON framework suggests that an external consciousness might influence quantum events in the camera’s sensor (or the electron beam of a CRT) to imprint an image into the feedback loop. The system’s sensitivity to small changes (due to positive feedback) then amplifies that image for captureatransc.org. This method requires minimal technology and is an excellent test-bed for transcommunicative influence, provided many frames are analyzed to distinguish genuine anomalies from random pareidolia.
Multimodal and Advanced Approaches
Multimodal ITC experiments involve multiple types of sensors or outputs simultaneously. The goal is to capture phenomena in more than one form, which can provide cross-verification (e.g., an audio voice coinciding with a spike in an EM sensor or an image appearance). They also broaden the “surface area” for potential interactions – perhaps an entity finds it easier to affect one kind of system than another, and we don’t want to miss it by only looking at audio or only video. Additionally, advanced approaches include using modern algorithms and AI to detect and analyze anomalies, as well as drawing on some of the latest technologies (from machine learning to quantum computing) to push the envelope of ITC research. Below are proposals combining modalities and innovative techniques:
- Audio-Video Synchronized Capture: Set up an audio recording device and a video camera in the same environment (for instance, a quiet room known for reported activity) and record simultaneously. Provide noise stimuli in both (white noise over a speaker for audio, and a visual noise like a static-filled TV screen or laser grid for video). The experiment looks for coincident anomalies – e.g., at the exact time a voice is caught on audio, does any visual anomaly (a light flicker, an image on the screen, a movement) occur on video? Conversely, if a weird image shows up, check the audio for any sound at that moment. By correlating timing, one can rule out random false positives (since the chance of unrelated audio and video anomalies happening at the same time is exceedingly low). This approach, using sensor fusion, strengthens the evidence: a conscious influence might naturally affect multiple channels at once if it’s perturbing the local environment or electronics. Tech-wise, this just needs synchronized clocks on recorder and camera, and analysis software to align the timelines. Cost is low if one already has a camera and recorder. This could be done now with consumer devices.
- Environmental Sensor Array with AI Trigger: Build a kit of various sensors – audio mic, electromagnetic field (EMF) meter, geomagnetic sensor, temperature sensor, maybe a random number generator (RNG) – all feeding data into a computer. Run this system in an allegedly haunted location or a shielded chamber for ITC experiments. The idea is that a manifesting information-plane influence might not only produce a voice, but could also cause slight EM disturbances or temperature changes due to energy being used. The computer continuously monitors all streams. Using an AI or rule-based algorithm, it flags moments when multiple sensors register anomalies concurrently (e.g., a spike in EMF and a sudden RNG deviation and a sound). Those moments are then examined for potential ITC messages. This approach is largely current-tech: microcontroller boards (like Arduinos or Raspberry Pi) can interface with various sensors, and simple algorithms or machine learning models can run on a laptop to detect correlations. Cost can range from a few hundred (DIY sensors and a PC) to a few thousand USD (if using high-end or many sensors). By having an automated, objective system, we reduce human bias and also require that any purported communication have a footprint across different physical modalities, aligning with a genuine physical influence rather than a single-sensor fluke.
- Direct Voice Apparatus (Operator-Independent): In traditional séances, direct voice phenomena are voices that appear in mid-air, sometimes attributed to spirit trumpets or ectoplasmic larynxes via mediums – very subjective and operator-dependent. Here we imagine an electronic direct-voice apparatus that doesn’t rely on a human medium. One concept: use a speaker emitting broad-spectrum sound just below audible volume (or masked with noise), and an array of microphones placed around the room. If a voice forms in the air (from subtle pressure waves), at least one mic will pick it up. Another concept is the so-called “Spiricom” approach updated: provide a set of audio tones or synthesized human-formant sounds continuously (as William O’Neil’s Spiricom device did with tones) and allow for any manipulation of those tones to form speech. The device could monitor the output with software to detect if any coherent patterns (like formant shifts corresponding to words) occur that were not pre-programmed. This is medium-tech – it involves generating sound and analyzing input – and can be done with a computer and some amplifiers. The cost depends on gear quality (maybe $500 for a decent multi-microphone and speaker setup). The COCOON idea here is that giving a “ready-made voice box” (tones that could be shaped, or an air medium to vibrate) might make it easier for an entity to directly produce audible speech by exerting influence on how those tones interfere or how the air vibrations form. It’s like partially providing the energy and structure of a voice, which an info-plane consciousness can tweak at the margins to articulate words, without an actual larynx.
- Consciousness-Influence Experiments: While we favor devices that run without needing a human’s mental intent at the time, one cannot ignore that consciousness in the Material Plane (the experimenter) might also play a role, according to COCOON. One experiment to optionally include is to test if focused mental intention by an operator can improve ITC results – e.g., have a test where the system runs with no one paying attention vs. runs where an operator actively concentrates on asking a spirit to speak. If COCOON is right, the operator’s consciousness could be acting as an additional bridge (their own IP link entangled with the target entity, facilitating the transfer). If statistically the sessions with focused intention yield more or clearer EVPs than the control sessions, that’s evidence for consciousness-assisted ITC. However, the ultimate goal is to design systems that don’t require this, because if a system can reliably work without a human present or involved, it’s far more objective (and also more practical for broad usage). This particular idea is more of a protocol variation than a device, but worth exploring within COCOON’s predictions (recall that two consciousnesses observing/participating in the same event become entangled (CCX)academia.edu, so a living operator and a spirit both focusing on the experiment could strengthen their link and thus the effect).
- Advanced Signal Processing & Validation: All the above experiments should incorporate modern signal processing to enhance and validate anomalous signals:
- For audio, techniques like spectral filtering, dynamic range compression, and noise reduction can make a faint voice more audible. One can use speech-to-text algorithms on suspected EVP to see if they consistently transcribe to the same phrase (and compare against control noise samples to ensure the transcription isn’t a random hit). Pattern recognition can quantify how voice-like a segment is, using metrics like formant structure or the presence of harmonics typical of vocal cords.
- For video, employing computer vision algorithms can help discern real images from random noise. For instance, use face detection on frames – if the software (trained on millions of real faces) flags a face with high confidence in the video noise, that’s significant. One can also use human-independent rating by having multiple volunteers blindly judge image captures or using a neural network to classify them.
- Cross-correlation and coincidence analysis increases confidence: if an EVP voice intelligently responds to a question (semantic correlation), that’s a form of validation. If two devices in different locations record the same voice at the same time (which has happened in some EVP cases), that’s strong evidence it’s not just a local random artifact. Designing experiments to sometimes run two recorders in parallel can test this – a genuine paranormal voice might imprint on both, whereas random noise voices will differ.
- Employ control experiments: e.g., record in the same environment with the device but not asking for voices, versus sessions where you do ask. Or run the device in a Faraday cage (blocking radio interference) to ensure voices aren’t stray broadcasts. Under COCOON, an IP entity influence shouldn’t be stopped by a Faraday cage (since it’s not electromagnetic transmission in the conventional sense), whereas radio interference would be. So differences between these conditions are telling.
- Innovative Component Ideas (Circuits & Software): Based on COCOON, any component that is sensitive to quantum fluctuations could serve as a gateway. Some futuristic or original ideas:
- A microtubule-inspired electronic circuit: Since COCOON highlights microtubules as biological quantum interfaces, one might create an artificial analog. For example, a network of Josephson junctions or other superconducting qubits arranged to be very sensitive to external influence. This is speculative, but imagine a grid of tiny oscillators that can become phase-coherent (ordered) if nudged correctly. If an IP consciousness can couple to that system, it might induce a detectable state change (like a specific oscillation pattern which we could translate to a message).
- Light-voice conversion devices: One could combine modalities by having a device that turns audio into visual patterns or vice versa, with randomness at each stage. For instance, use a Geiger counter (detecting radioactive decay, a truly random quantum event) to trigger syllables from a speech synthesizer – essentially an “informational Geiger phone”. Or use fluctuating light intensity (from a noise-driven LED) to encode audio (via a solar cell receiver). These are complex, but the idea is to present multiple hurdles that only a genuine informational influence could consistently overcome to produce a meaningful outcome.
- Machine Learning Models as ITC Medium: A very novel approach might be to use an AI generative model (like a neural network trained on images or text) and feed it random seeds, seeing if coherent output (e.g., sentences or pictures) that are relevant come out more often than they should. For example, use a large language model but constrain it with random initial conditions – does it produce any intelligible message potentially from an external source? This treads into philosophical territory: could a non-local consciousness use a complex AI as an “instrument” to speak (especially if the AI is near the cusp of sense vs. nonsense)? Some researchers have wondered if AI systems could be influenced by spirits. While far-out, it aligns with COCOON’s principle that information can flow into any system open to quantum uncertainty – and complex AI might have some chaotic degrees of freedom that allow subtle biasing.
Combining all these, one can design a comprehensive experimental program. For instance, a test chamber where audio noise is played, video feedback runs, environment sensors monitor, and everything is recorded and analyzed together. One session could be run with an operator inviting communication and one without, to compare. If COCOON’s predictions hold, we might observe that meaningful EVP and ITC results occur when – and only when – an informational influence is present (e.g., during an intentional session or in a haunted location), and that these results correlate across systems (audio and video anomalies together, multiple sensors agreeing). Also, we’d expect these anomalies to convey information, not just random spooky sounds. That is, they might answer questions or show recognizable faces, tapping into that Information Plane repository of knowledge.
Conclusion
COCOON theory provides a compelling cosmological model in which consciousness is an active participant in reality, bridging a physical world and a nonlocal information realm. By reframing paranormal phenomena as natural interactions between the Material Plane and the Information Plane, COCOON offers a theoretical grounding for EVP and ITC. In this view, disembodied consciousnesses (or any conscious entities) can impart “intended order” onto random physical systems to create signals – a whisper from the Information Plane echoed in the material world. We summarized how the Material and Information planes interact via quantum processes and how consciousness serves as the conduitacademia.edufile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrht, accumulating experiences in a manner that might even explain memory, intuition, and interconnected minds.
Applying this framework to EVP/ITC, we see a plausible mechanism for how voices and images can appear from beyond: consciousness uses quantum entanglement and latent information to imprint messages on electronic noise. This demystifies EVP – rather than violating physics, such phenomena use subtler physics (quantum randomness and entanglement) as a loophole to convey information, all consistent with COCOON’s extended natural laws. An Information Plane interacting with physical systems could produce perceivable outputs by influencing the probabilities in those systems – essentially tipping the scales so that meaningful patterns emerge where normally chaos reigns.
We then proposed a range of experimental designs informed by these ideas. These included straightforward audio and video setups employing background noise, radio sweeps, and feedback loops to invite transcommunication, as well as more advanced and speculative approaches like quantum random generators and sensor fusion arrays. The designs were categorized by modality and complexity, ensuring options from DIY-budget experiments to high-end laboratory apparatus. A common theme is to provide a rich playground of randomness – be it sound static, visual static, or quantum noise – and to apply modern signal processing and AI to detect any needles of order in that haystack of disorder. We emphasized keeping humans out of the loop as much as possible during data collection (to achieve operator-independence), while still acknowledging that human intention could be an asset in some configurations per COCOON’s notions of entangled experiences.
In implementing these experiments, researchers should employ rigorous controls and validations: differentiate genuine anomalies from pareidolia or radio interference, use statistical analysis to gauge significance, and replicate phenomena across independent runs. If the COCOON-guided experiments yield consistent EVP/ITC results – for example, clear voices that respond intelligently or images of specific people appearing in a feedback loop – it would not only bolster the case for survival of consciousness (or otherworldly communication), but also serve as empirical support for the COCOON ontology itself. It would suggest that consciousness and information truly do have a foot in a deeper level of reality and can step into our physical world when conditions are right.
Ultimately, the fusion of COCOON theory with ITC experimentation charts a path toward a scientific understanding of “spiritual” communication. It transforms the pursuit of EVP/ITC from a fringe curiosity into a testable hypothesis about how mind and matter interact across the veil. The key insight is that what we call a “ghost voice” or a mysterious image might be the product of an entangled cosmos where minds are not confined to brains, and where information links can momentarily light up our instruments with messages from a parallel plane. By investing in such multifaceted experiments – spanning audio, visual, and beyond – we push forward the frontier of research into consciousness and its reach, hopefully inching closer to integrating these anomalies into mainstream knowledge. The COCOON framework not only inspires these innovative experiments but also provides a narrative in which the results, if positive, have a place in a logical, cosmological context rather than remaining isolated anomalies. In short, COCOON gives us a map, and EVP/ITC experiments are vehicles – together, they may lead us to a new territory of understanding where science and spirit meet.
Sources:
- del Rio, I. A Cosmological Consciousness Ontology (COCOON) – (COCOON theory definition and framework)academia.eduacademia.eduacademia.eduacademia.edufile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrhtfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrhtfile-g8omx7o2tdjdqizlwamrhtacademia.edu.
- “Electronic Voice Phenomena” – We Don’t Die website – (background noise as energy for voices)wedontdie.com.
- Butler, T. “Formation of EVP” – ATransC – (radio sweep technique yields voice-frequency noise, aiding voice formation)atransc.org.
- Butler, T. “Holographic ITC” – ATransC – (video loop ITC method and stochastic amplification of images)atransc.org.
- Wikipedia: “Stochastic Resonance” – (noise can amplify weak signals in nonlinear systems)en.wikipedia.orgen.wikipedia.org.
- Butler, T. ATransC White Paper – (intention brings order to chaotic noise; personality influences environment)atransc.org.